Sunday, July 25, 2010

At eComm, then FiberFête; Live notes will be on Twitter

I arrived in San Francisco last night for the Emerging Communications Conference which begins today.  I'll be taking notes live on Twitter, not here. 

eComm runs three days and I'm hosting a panel on the US National Broadband Plan on Tuesday.  The 3rd day of eComm is entirely devoted to Augmented Reality. Unfortunately, I have a conflict and will have to miss the 3rd day.

On Wednesday and Thursday, I'll be at FiberFête in Lafayette Louisiana.  I'm extremely interested in augmented reality so I hate to miss the 3rd day of eComm, but I also have a long standing interest in telecom and Internet policy and industry structure.  What's more, I'm involved in a start up that aims to do an end run around some of the structural problems holding back broadband in the US.

Both conferences have excellent programs, but in each case it's the people who are attending, even more than the program, that are the attraction and have caused me to slice and dice my schedule this week.

For my take on the conferences, as they transpire, follow my primary Twitter feed.

April 19, 2010 at 08:17 AM in Conferences

View the Original article

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Audiocast tomorrow: Satellite phones, spectrum games and more

Tomorrow, Tuesday the 15th at 11am eastern time, I'll be live on an audiocast organized by Carl Ford of 4GWE and TMCNet.  

The title is "4G is in the Stars: Satellite to Terrestrial" and speakers include Barlow Keener, Lyman Chapin and yours truly.

The prize is 68 MHz of spectrum at 1.4 GHz.  In the US and Canada, this spectrum has been allocated for Mobile Satellite systems but it can also be used for Ancillary Terrestrial Services - that is services that are ancillary to the satellite services! This spectrum would be good cellular spectrum if you could get it, being above the 800 MHz original cellular bands but below the 1.9 GHz PCS bands. Technically, the satellite signals go up and down while the ancillary signals go mostly horizontally, so they are relatively independent. The big question is: Can anyone afford to launch satellites and run satellite services just so they can also use this spectrum for LTE services at ground level?

Gigaom has been skeptical, but when you stack up the estimated $5B to build a network against the possible value of this spectrum at auction, i.e. 68 MHz at US$1.2 per MHz-POP (the price paid in the US 700 MHz auctions) and 335 million POPs in the US & Canada you get roughly $27B. That math could work...

Join us tomorrow at 11am eastern by registering here.

June 14, 2010 at 03:55 PM in Broadband Access, Mobile, Spectrum, Wireless

View the Original article

FiOS Internet performance deteriorating


I've had Verizon FiOS service since the first week it was available in our neighborhood (July 2005). At that time it was advertised as 15 Mbps down and 2 Mbps up, a.k.a. 15/2, for $49.99 per month. Measured speeds actually came very close, as shown here. And these measurements were repeatable.

Over the years the service has been upgraded by Verizon with no action required on my part. Today my service is called "FiOS Internet 20/5." Unfortunately the price has also crept up, to $62.99 per month, again with no action required on my part!

The problem is, today, my FiOS service is highly variable. At times it's very slow. Skype audio breaks up on some calls and works fine on others. But this is anecdotal. Where's the data? 

Gathering data

So ten weeks ago, I started a regular program of testing using a keyboard macro program on a mostly idle PC connected via a wired Ethernet cable to a switch and then to the FiOS service jack. I set it up to run sequences of 3 Speedtests and 3 Pingtests every two hours throughout the day. In our house, these tests seldom ran uninterrupted for more than 30 hours and my manual restarts were sometimes delayed by several days. Also, the accuracy of the macro software wasn't always up to the fine mouse pointing that Speedtest and Pingtest require to select servers. But over the past 10 weeks I've managed to get 646 good Speedtest runs against nearby servers (in Boston) and 549 good PingTest runs against Boston servers. 

This evening I've done some data analysis which confirms the wide variation I saw anecdotally.



View the Original article

xG Technology at WISPA

xG Technology was exhibiting at the WISPA conference in St. Louis July 21-22, as they also did at the 4G Wireless Evolution conference in Miami in January.  In January, I visited their facilities in Fort Lauderdale and talked at length with their founder, Joe Bobier.  This is a company that, back in 2006, made some outrageous claims for a new kind of radio modulation.  At the time, some friends asked me to look into their claims.  I read their literature and their patent filings and concluded it couldn’t work as claimed without violating either the laws of physics or FCC regulations or both, and I wrote a blog post to that effect. Indeed my original conclusions appear to have been true. In 2006, they naively thought they could get the FCC to change specs for out-of-band signal levels.

What’s interesting is how they have completely reinvented their company. They have dropped the magic modulation ideas of 2006. Today, they are in alpha test with a mobile voice telephony system that uses conventional first order modulation.  I don’t know whether they will succeed in the market, but today’s product is at least built on credible technology, they are going after plausible customer sets, and what they’ve done is cute enough (from a techie point of view) to be worth some discussion.

Their system allows a service provider to delivery a cellular mobile voice service much like any other mobile voice service plus it can support optional data services at GPRS-like data rates.  The key difference is their system uses license-exempt spectrum in the 900 MHz band, thus avoiding big bucks for spectrum licenses.  They deal with interference from other users of the 900 MHz band by monitoring in both frequency and time and rapidly switching channels (up to 33 times/second) to avoid interfering signals.

Of course there are no standards for such a system so, while the RF technology is now very conventional, the base stations and handsets are proprietary.  They have adapted VoIP and SIP standards where possible, so their MSC is just a conventional 3rd party softswitch.  However, some of how they handle channel hopping, roaming and handoffs is inconsistent with IETF standards, so they have a SIP proxy and a DHCP proxy that together isolate their proprietary protocols (used over the air) from the rest of the system which use standard IP components and standard SIP.

I don’t know whether their business will work or not. Their current system delivers mobile voice telephony plus data at 2G speeds, but it doesn’t roam. It might be a good fixed line replacement providing city-wide cordless telephony, not unlike the PAS systems deployed in China, but with no need for spectrum licenses.  I wish them luck.

July 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM in Conferences, Mobile, VoIP, Wireless

View the Original article

Consumer Reports Says Steer Clear of iPhone 4

Consumer Reports has tested the iPhone 4 in its lab and has duplicated the antenna problem so many are having. The problem has to do with signal quality degrading to the point of calls being dropped by the iPhone. The fix they found is to use duct tape or other nonconductive material to cover the spot on the lower left of the phone which causes problems.

Apple, for its part is going to roll out a software update which alters its calculation of antenna bars and they believe this will solve the problem. Millions trust Consumer Reports and it is tough to doubt their findings - especially since so many others have the same problem.

It seems to me at this point that Apple will be forced to shell out for free cases for all iPhone users or have a recall of some sort. The solution may be a combination of both of these as people like me do not want a plastic cover for my phone. This can't be a cheap solution - you have to figure $50-$100 per iPhone 4 sold depending on what Apple chooses to do.

It seems though the company may have a much more serious challenge on its hands than it is admitting to the public and especially its shareholders.

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary. July 12, 2010 3:12 PM

View the Original article

They Should call it Cursed Phone 4

I have written repeatedly about how Apple is in an amazing position and how competing with the company is becoming very difficult. The company's desktops and laptops are getting a massive lift from the buzz surrounding the iPod, iPhone and iPad and as more people buy these aforementioned devices, the community of customers purchasing music and apps soars.

Many companies have cycles they go through - no organization has a share price or business which goes straight up. But if you had to choose a top for a company would it not be when it sees its market cap soar to surpass almost all others? Apple recently had a stock price of $279 which translates into a market cap of $253.8B which put it just behind Exxon Mobil who currently has a market cap of $274B making it the most valuable American company by this measure. As of this writing however the share price of the Cupertino-based Apple has taken a dive down to $241.65 which is a market cap of $219.7B.

Over 30 billion dollars wiped out in a few weeks and many attribute the loss to the antenna problems of the iPhone 4.

I should point out that 13 days ago, TMC's Robert Hashemian wrote an article on TMCnet's financial technology news site regarding Apple shares going to $45. The article was a follow-up from blog entry he wrote on June 21, 2010 titled Apple to $45. I should mention that I told Robert the whole premise of Apple losing such a large amount of value was ludicrous back in June. But sure enough at that time the stock was trading at $270 and had the article convinced you the shares were going lower, you would have saved yourself about $30/share.

Still, I consider Apple, Oracle, Cisco and Salesforce.com among the best-positioned companies in tech going forward. Apple still tops my list because they keep coming out with new products which are new and successful. The iPad for example is a product which from Apple's perspective is just a large iPod Touch. For me though it has become an indispensable business tool and fills a void I didn't know existed between my phone and laptop.

So with so much going for it, why is the company falling in value? The answer is it is dealing with a slew of problems which seem to be part of a downward cycle. Virtually all of the recent issues however are related to the iPhone 4 as when the device first became public it was because an Apple staffer left one in a bar and it was subsequently discovered by Gizmodo and this resulted in Apple having the police raid the home of a Gizmodo editor and confiscate any items related to the device. Most companies do their best to treat the press with respect, dignity and the utmost courtesy - raiding homes of the people who uncover scoops is not generally the way to endear yourself to reporters. So lets call this goof number one.

Then there was the unveiling of the iPhone 4 where Steve Jobs had to request audience members to turn off their WiFi APs so he could get his demo to work. This is one of the most embarrassing things which could happen during a live demo and the incident coupled with 3G problems had the audience roaring with laughter. This was especially the case when someone in the audience shouted the word "Verizon."

Steve Jobs dealing with WiFi issues during iPhone 4 launch

   

Then of course this leads us to antenna-gate which is loosely defined as coming out with a phone which makes worse quality phone calls than the phone it replaces. Normally this shouldn't be a problem - unless of course your old phone was featured on Saturday Night Live as not being able to make phone calls either. So basically you upgrade a device which has publicly ridiculed call quality with one which is worse.

To compound the problem, Apple responded to early customer complaints about the "death grip" resulting in lost calls when a hand was placed on the lower-left side of the device by saying customers were holding the phone improperly. Then the company came out and said they would solve the problem with a software update. Then they said the algorithm which controls the antenna bars was faulty. Then Apple came out and said there is no fix and all customers who aren't happy can get a refund without a restocking fee and they also get a free case which should solve the problem. You have until September 30th, 2010 to take advantage of this offer by the way.

During the recent "apologetic" speech given by Jobs he reminded us that keeping customers happy is what Apple is all about - that is of course unless being able to correctly see the millions of Web sites which use Adobe's Flash makes you happy.

And Steve Jobs seemed to make yet another uncharacteristic error - saying the problems with the iPhone 4 are the same as those being seen throughout the industry. The reality is the CEO of no other mobile company I am aware of had to have a major press conference apologizing for antenna problems. In stark contrast, the meetings I have had with RIM execs for a decade or longer almost always begin with the massive amount of R&D the company spends on antenna design.

In the last few months, Apple has gone from doing nothing wrong to virtually everything wrong. And I say this with the ultimate respect for the amazing products the company continues to come out with. But still, these problems are big, important and the antennagate situation is not over in my opinion. I still think a recall may be looming - especially if one emergency call gets dropped on this phone and it leads to injury or worse. Just the poor PR alone caused by such a case may force a recall.

Then there is the Google Android threat. I was somewhat lukewarm on Android until I saw the Motorola Droid X and now I am a believer that this phone and OS combo can do serious damage to the Apple mobile brand. For those of you with fat thumbs like me, typing on the larger screen will be much easier. And boy is it fast - even over 3G.

If I had to make a bet, I would say that if Steve Jobs remains healthy and the company gets past this incident in the next year or so, the sky is the limit for Apple. They will continue to put more pressure on Microsoft, Nokia and RIM while simultaneously selling more laptops and desktops to people who are wowed by Apple stores and the company's products in general. In 18 months I would not be surprised to see the company having the largest market cap of any publicly traded company. Of course the price of oil going up could keep Exxon Mobil's value growing as well.

But if Apple doesn't turn the momentum train around soon, it could lead to bigger problems. Let's not forget customers are still buying iPhone 4s and iPads by the million - but in the end if the company gets a reputation of having flawed products for enough time, enormous damage will be done to the Apple brand. And it all started with the iPhone 4 which if not cursed is certainly  the cause for tremendous profanity from Apple customers and employees.

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary. July 19, 2010 6:10 PM

View the Original article

Truphone, GlowPoint, XConnect, In Store Solutions News and More

Today, TMC hosted a number of companies in the communications and technology spaces and it was a learning experience for all. Much news was broken and you can expect a torrent of related articles from my editors this week. TMC's Juliana Kenny does a great job giving you an overview of the companies we met with below.

 

The following companies were present and clicking on the links will take you to video explaining exactly what they do and what they plan to provide customers in the future. Aretta Communications, In Store Solutions, InPhonex, Ringio, Truphone, XConnect and GlowPoint.

Below are videos of Melissa Schmitt of Truphone and Thomas Howe of In Store Solutions.

Thomas explains how a $300 device and Skype can make a complete telepresence solution for an SMB


For articles on today's guests please see the following:

TMC's Stefania Viscusi covers the latest on In Store SolutionsTMC's Marisa Torrieri covers the latest on InPhonexTMC's Juliana Kenny covers the latest on RingioTMC's Marisa Torrieri covers Truphone newsTMC's Juliana Kenny covers the latest on Glowpoint Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /

View the Original article

Friday, July 23, 2010

Skype Upgrade Supercharges iPhone 4

For all the benefits Skype has given users of PCs and MACs, on an iPhone the app was inferior on so many levels. Bluetooth connectivity was nonexistent and multitasking was not allowed on the app - the OS didn't support it either. Basically you could use Skype for outbound calls on your iPhone but a lack of multitasking meant you dropped calls when you left the app and forget about IM because again, if you left the app to check email or stream music you wouldn't get your inbound messages.

Today, the company just announced an upgrade which should make Skype one of the most-used apps on the iPhone. The most important move they made was financial as you no longer need to pay to make calls over 3G. Well at this point you didn't need to anyway but there was a threat that the company was going to start charging after September 1, 2010. This date was pushed to the beginning of next year due to user complaints and now it seems the idea of charging is going away altogether.

The other important benefits of this upgrade has to do with the multitasking support of iOS4 which means you get notified instantly when you receive an IM or call and are in another app or the home screen. This includes the lock screen. I did test this functionality for chats and calls and I was notified instantly of all communications while on the home screen of an iPhone 4. It is worth noting however these benefits come to the iPhone 3GS and iPod Touch if you upgrade the OS.

When chatting and speaking on a non-Skype 3G connection via AT&T I heard an audible tone in the headset when sending messages. I also noticed that while on a call, none of my outbound chats arrived on the receiver's cell phone until we disconnected the call. When you call using Skype, the application does not support bluetooth, you are still limited to speaker and iPhone as the sole modes of communications. Speaking of communications, the sound quality using Skype over 3G was quite good - it seemed potentially superior to traditional 3G calls based on the single conversation I had during preliminary testing.

One of the very major drawbacks of the iPad is the lack of Skype support with multitasking. In meetings where iPads are deployed there is no way to instantly communicate with a coworker and this makes the iPad a poor laptop replacement for companies requiring instant communications while simultaneously taking notes. The good news is multitasking is heading to the iPad and when it arrives the device becomes one step closer to a netbook/laptop replacement.

This upgrade by Skype could not have come sooner and the company needs to be very careful as Apple is now a competitor with its FaceTime application which allows seamless videoconferencing over WiFi networks. In fact, Skype has to be terribly concerned about becoming disintermediated by Apple and losing its lock on customers.

It goes without saying that carriers too better start worrying about Apple (more). Skype has caught up to some of the other players in the mobile VoIP and chat space and now they need to tackle video. With Apple as a competitor, you have to work extra hard to stay relevant and as always in such wars, the winners are the customers.

Although there was no time to test this issue, I have a slight concern that battery performance could be hampered by running Skype in background as is the case with other mobile devices. TMCnet will certainly have more to report on this issue in the future.

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary. July 21, 2010 7:40 PM

View the Original article

ShopVisible on Mobile Commerce

There has been and will continue to be a massive increase in mobile commerce as consumers are becoming more accustomed to shopping online and mobile devices are proliferating and providing bigger screens and better interfaces. Personally I have been amazed at how easy it is to use a number of sites such as Amazon to purchase as I am walking while walking by doing a quick search and check-out without the need to enter in a great deal of data.

There are many hundreds of thousands of retailers globally or more who must grapple with developing online interfaces which allow customers to make rapid purchases regardless of device. ShopVisible LLC is one company devoted to helping retailers migrate seamlessly to the mobile web and I did get a chance to test one of the implementations they performed for a customer and thought the results were good in that they gave consumers a chance to find what they wanted in a non-cluttered manner. You can try for yourself as one of the company's clients is listed below.

To learn more, I interviewed Sean Cook, Chief Executive Officer (pictured) below:

 

View the Original article

Magazine Ads Significantly Influence the Wealthy to Purchase

A TMCnet team member sent me an article from Forbes which is titled Ultra Rich Spending Less And Chasing Quality and gives fascinating insight on what makes these people tick and moreover how they spend and how to influence them. The piece is based upon The Survey of Affluence and Wealth in America 2010 - a creation of American Express Publishing and the Harrison Group who polled about 2,400 people from the richest 10% of U.S. households. The article starts with some interesting notes - 91% of the mega wealthy feel we are still in the middle of a recession but they are happier than the rest of the population when it comes to their personal relationships.

It is certainly worth a read as there is fascinating insight to be gained. As the CEO of a company which publishes four magazines I found the section dealing with what influences these people to be the most interesting.

About 69% answered that they pay more attention to print ads than those online. Only 8% said they use Facebook to make a purchasing decision, though more than 40% had Facebook accounts.

It is common thinking among some that print ads have declining influence in purchasing decisions compared to the web but this research shows how important magazine ads still are.

And this brings me back to the schizophrenic marketers I often speak with who will go into detail regarding their marketing budgets and volunteer why they don't think their customers read print magazines. But these same people upon hearing TMC is going to write about them ask - will the article be in one of your magazines?

This is not to say I don't understand why many marketers send these mixed messages. TMC has a thriving online business and part of the reason for the growth of this area for our company has to do with the incredible amount of measurability related to spending marketing dollars online. The challenge for the magazine market is proving results.

The plain truth is some marketers feel they need to cover their rear and spending money where there are metrics to back up the decision is safer than spending money where it is more difficult to measure results. And this is the case - even if the magazine marketing spend is most effective. But for the smartest marketers out there it is worth considering that the share of mind resulting from your magazine ad spend has perhaps never been greater. And besides, who couldn't use a few more ultra-rich customers?

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary. July 23, 2010 10:22 AM

View the Original article